There is a practice amongst most of the mainstream media outlets to avoid reporting on individual suicide cases. I don’t claim to know all the reasons behind this practice but when you look at the factors such as respect for the victim’s family and a concern about glamorizing the suicidal acts, one could make a strong argument for avoiding (publishing) the issue.
On the other hand, some methods of suicide (such as jumping off a bridge) create a visible public disruption, and it could be argued that the public should be able to know some basic information. Such information could be provided or reported while still allowing the individual to remain unnamed, and with journalism that provided information without sensationalism.
I often wander the city on my lunch break, and on Monday I came across the Portland Fire Bureau’s Dive Team van parked at waterfront park, lights flashing. Further investigation revealed more emergency vehicles and a situation on the Burnside Bridge which turned out to be a potential jumper standing up on the railing.
I shot a few photos of the general scene, then wandered across the bridge, snapping a few photos along the way. The police had the westbound lanes/sidewalks shut down but eastbound traffic was moving. I shot a couple photos that included the person standing up on the railing. Based on my location and some foreground obstacles (construction fencing), you can’t identify the person at all.
I don’t know the outcome of the situation; when I left to return to work the person was still on the railing.
And so I ponder, would it be appropriate to publish the photos that include the jumper? Is there a newsworthiness value to seeing what was going on? I posed the question on Twitter. Some told me that it would be in extremely poor taste, while someone else made the comment that if the person wanted privacy, they would’ve done it in private.
Given the fact that the situation shut down a major bridge during the middle of the day, I’d say there’s some newsworthiness. The photos don’t disclose the person’s identity in any way. Would the publication of the photos lead to a glamorization of the event? Would they be disrespectful to the person involved, even though that person isn’t identified? How does this compare to showing photos of mangled, charred automobiles following fatal crashes?
Discuss.
edit/update: Apparently The Oregonian featured a photo of the individual on the front page of today’s dead-tree Metro section. Portland Police talked the man down. I still ask the same questions, with a further note: since the man didn’t jump, does that change the appropriateness of posting/publishing the photos?